I think Torres would score for fun at Arsenal tbh
I think he's an above average striker at International level and a good striker at premier league level. @Hutch rates him as a better goalscorer than two players who have bee genuinely world class as little as 3 years ago, a striker who averages almost a goal every 2 games in Ba and a striker who has close to 25 league goals in the last 14 months in Lukaku - very high praise.'how do you rank giroud?
Bar Ba (lol) i'd have every other striker mentioned ITT instead of Giroud. I do rate the lad though.
Giroud has probably been Arsenal's most important player this season imo.
Against Newcastle he got kicked to bits (and also hurt himself trying to tackle Tiote haha) but was able to man up and put the ball in the back of the net.
Arsenal in recent season have been bottlers who get bullied out of points they should be picking up, Giroud is helping change that.
I wasn't including Lukaku in what I said as he has no effect on putting away the chances Hazard creates. Guess your slow brain didn't pick up on that though.
Giroud >> Torres >> Eto'o >>> Ba
It's the other way round. When Giroud is upfront our midfield is better. They were fucking clueless against Newcastle for the most part. Missed Giroud so much... They was always looking for him.
OP is chatting shit. Yes Giroud isn't clinical but neither are the Chelsea strikers (Lukaka included). Some of the misses from Eto'o n Torres have been so poor... They used to be leathal.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Gnabry >>>>> Januzaj
I can't let it slide, I see them niggas I go get my nine
Cause when it's reppin' time, I delete them niggas with a weapon of mine
Lukaku would be a beast at Arsenal
He's good enough. We need two more alternatives. A player similar to Giroud in terms of hold up play and a Suarez-type player.
Having those three + Walcott and Podolski allows Arsenal the flexibility of going 442 for certain games or at stages during a match.
[QUOTE=Hutch;3372798]I wasn't including Lukaku in what I said as he has no effect on putting away the chances Hazard creates. Guess your slow brain didn't pick up on that though.
Giroud >> Torres >> Eto'o >>> Ba[/QUOTE]
Care to explain why PAL or you making another unsubstantiated claim like usual.
What prem strikers are better though?
Aguero, Saurez, Rooney, Negredo, dunno who else really? He isn't world class but sorta 2nd tier, similar to Hernandez, Soldado (before spurs at least), Sturridge, Remy all similar level.
Definitely offers arsenal a good target man, someone to play off of.
I watch our strikers struggle to score week in week out when they get plenty of chances. Its not hard to understand.
Giroud gets in better positions he would easily score more than our strikers at Chelsea.
(again I'm not talking about Lukaku)
"Is it my fault that i think I'm better than everyone else? Or society's for setting the bar so low?" - Husso
"Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated" - Anon
2. Replace Strikers with 'striker' and this is what most Arsenal fans have gone through since RVP left. E'too and Torres have track records of scoring large amounts of goals whereas as Giroud doesn't so how doe your claim support argument. Please present facts to strengthen your opinion PAL I.E. CHANCES MISSED, MINUTES PLAYED ETC.
3. Says who?
4. See above