You say her name & you're in contempt, but, putting pictures up, should be cool, it's out there in the public domain any way.
She put it in the public domain, she's still on twitter.
Yo & 'She who shall not be named'... what she said wasn't fly or consistent to that of a rape victim, she was drunk & he didn't get the 'yes' so he left himself wide open as a footballer to get exploited.. but, supposedly she had 2 previous cases where she tried to do this... again that's *allegedly*
Even if what happened was against the law & to the letter of the law his actions should mean prison. Those tweets doesn't suggest she is doing this to put away someone who can cause harm to society, or in an attempt to seek damage for the trauma she's gone through.
It looks very much like a pay day.
Jury had the details & have a fuller story (perhaps), but, we've seen refereeing decisions & know how when you place trust in humans you're bound to get wrong decisions.