Yes. Clearly sprints and barges him in the back, definite penalty.
If you vote itt please justify your vote.
Settle an argument between myself and @JamieQpr , yes or no, simple as that
http://www.soccerclips.net/videos/qp...a-helguson-pen
Last edited by chris89; 19th February '12 at 06:10 PM.
Yes. Clearly sprints and barges him in the back, definite penalty.
If you vote itt please justify your vote.
WHU > QPR
I must keep this avatar and sig untill further notice for losing a bet enforced by Hij.
lol seems OTT going down because of the push, but I think Luiz catches his foot afterwards which is maybe why he falls over
So you dont need to justify your reasoning? I'm not trying to influence people, I'm just saying why I believe it is a penalty. You can clearly see he sprints to him, barges him and knocks him over, I dont see how you can deny that its a penalty? Please correct me if I'm missing something.
WHU > QPR
I must keep this avatar and sig untill further notice for losing a bet enforced by Hij.
He doesn't get barged enough to go down, and for that reason it's not a penalty, I've said this before in the other thread but for some reason you keep ignoring my 'reasoning' because you don't deem it to be correct, that's not how opinions work.
Anyway, no rep to be won ITT no idea why you are here tbh
Helguson couldve stayed on his feet, there was contact but he made the most of it tbh.
-NSF-
twitter: @NSFProducer
Email and iMessage: nsfproducer @ gmail.com
*NEW* NSF - Knaks (WIP):
http://soundcloud.com/nsf/knaks-wip
Tbh it is a penalty but an extremely weak one. Hate these sorts worse than those random handball ones etc.
"Is it my fault that i think I'm better than everyone else? Or society's for setting the bar so low?" - Husso
"Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated" - Anon
He sprinted full pace at him and barged him, if he did that to most people in the back he'd knock them over. iirc you didn't say it in the other thread, you just kept saying about how I was biased and talking about polls and rep.
Serious football discussion only here please, there are no sarcastic comments to be made ITT I dont know why you are here tbh
WHU > QPR
I must keep this avatar and sig untill further notice for losing a bet enforced by Hij.
Serious answer: Luiz should have known better than to barge someone in the penalty area at their home ground, even a slight barge. If he doesn't do that, there's no opportunity for Helguson to dive.
Helguson clearly makes the most of it and plays for it. It's a dive but Luiz should have been smarter.
tl;dr - It's a dive and I'd be furious if that was given against my team.
Fair enough, I dont remember reading that tbh lol. But that reasoning is wrong? You admitted Sturridge had dived later in the thread, so how was it exactly like that penalty? You can clearly see he sprints full pace at him and barges him, so its hardly like Sturridge who flings himself to the deck after no/a touch by Hill.
WHU > QPR
I must keep this avatar and sig untill further notice for losing a bet enforced by Hij.
@Mr. Jefferies pls vote itt
men lie women lie numbers don't
Alright maybe not like Sturridge, but still not a penalty because he goes down like a little kid, players get barged 10 times harder all over the pitch and stay on their feet.
It was a dive, you can tell.
But that's beyond the point; how the fuck is Chelsea not whipping QPR's ass? They deserve to get scored on by a penalty.
@chris89
it was very soft, and helguson simulated the fall, but luiz should have known better to run over an barge someone in the back in the penalty area in front of the referee while being the last man...
and you can't say he didnt barge him hard enough for it to be a peno, it was a peno because of the sitiuation, they werent tussling waiting for a corner etc
that nudge probably would have sent you 6 foot into the air chap.
Bookmarks